ISAR Member Forum

I think that somewhere you also sense that this is not exactly objective. Let me explain why I don't think it is.

The previous emotional cycle operated along the Sagittarius–Gemini axis. I myself deliberately applied to Semmelweis University precisely because of this. I was accepted. I could start in September.

BUT I had to change jobs because of what my previous employer did. No matter how conscious and deliberate I was, my employer simply lost control of the situation. I have to postpone my studies for one year because, having started at a new workplace, I cannot begin my university studies at the same time.

The emotional axis continuously oscillates and shifts back and forth. By now, it has moved into the Capricorn–Cancer analogy. Social patterns of behavior are changing. Those who have not yet begun their cycle cannot simply carry it forward, or they will only be able to begin it under significantly more difficult circumstances.

AND here comes another BUT.

What is astrology?

Astrology cannot predict events in a space-time interval in advance. There is no scientific evidence for that. However, astrology can be understood as a mathematical permutation space in which space is connected with time, and so on. It describes an ideal mathematical set of behavioral patterns. When the environment and the individual are positioned within the system in accordance with the relevant dynamic processes, the corresponding experiences emerge.

The KEY POINT is the ideal situation, the lack of scientific evidence for such interconnectedness, and the fact that neither human beings nor their environments function ideally.

The real question is therefore this:

Are you capable of experiencing your own healthy emotional processes within a non-ideal environment?

Are you capable of functioning in a healthy way even when the environment does not connect with you in a healthy manner, meaning that you will have to operate under significantly more difficult circumstances?

Is it worth it?

Even if you will continue to face obstacles afterward?

And in your own case, will you end up adopting unhealthy behavioral patterns simply to emotionally stabilize yourself and enable yourself to experience and complete your own processes?

This is the objective reality, and this is also the objective reality of astrology.

There is no ideal individual–environment relationship.

If someone does have one, they achieve it through FORCE and through the suppression of others. The foundation of the system—and the foundation of religion—is based on balance. And if something is not reciprocal, there is always abuse involved, because the system cannot achieve equilibrium.

And as I see it, many Americans do not understand this. We Europeans do. Especially we Hungarians.

Generationally, we carry these burdens as well. We have been oppressed and punished too many times. It was escalated to the point where we were even physically incapacitated, because they could not break us psychologically or emotionally.

Yes, it would really be good to set this straight, because astrologers inherently possess an attitude of superiority—an attitude that creates ethical room for such behavior. That is precisely why I developed a method that makes ethical abuse impossible. However, this requires changes that many astrologers dislike. To this day, there is no proof linking Einstein’s space-time concepts to planetary cycles. Furthermore, if we consider Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development from a psychological perspective, there is no proof there either. And as long as astrology remains rooted in religion and faith, it will become fixed within the religious realm and ultimately transform into a religion itself—at which point the whole thing becomes meaningless. Synchronicity is equated with religion, and these problematic cases will simply continue to accumulate. Modernizing astrology is inevitable, as is a return to the realm of science; yet, poor practices are hindering this process. I myself encounter significant obstacles. There are no minimum professional standards, the current code of ethics is inadequate, and the various schools of thought lack unification.

It would be beneficial to clarify this from a professional standpoint—specifically, where the boundary lies between religion and science within the context of astrology. Furthermore, when a client projects their subconscious, we need to determine how to provide professional reinforcement and how to facilitate the processing of material within this projective space. There are instances where the subconscious drives an unhealthy pattern of functioning; if this is reinforced, the client may suffer long-term harm. Therefore, it is necessary to ground them in reality so they can live their life free from trauma.