The Average Astrologer is Not an Historian
One of the most remarkable aspects of my rectification of the Age of Aquarius commencing in the fifteenth century is that it was not derived from historians. Yet when one turns to the historians themselves, one discovers that they have repeatedly identified the fifteenth century as one of the great turning points in world history. The only comparable century was exactly one age earlier. Centuries that contain the beginning of a new age stand out from the rest.
This convergence of opinion is striking because the historians approach the period from entirely different disciplines and theoretical frameworks. Some write as cultural historians, others as political historians, economic historians, sociologists, or historians of civilization. Some are openly hostile toward astrology. Yet they repeatedly arrive at the same conclusion: around the fifteenth century, something fundamentally new entered history.
The period from approximately 1400 to 1500 AD is frequently described…



This is an amazing article in order to bringging on the table that majority, not only astrologer, but also the people that only repeat what the media says without make a correct judgment about the content and the context of the message.