ISAR Member Forum

Hi everyone! I am nearing the end of my study. I believe I have clearly articulated why astrology is currently considered a pseudoscience, what needs to change, and the genuine research directions worth pursuing—at least here in Hungary. It will also become evident why conventional astrological research paths are destined to yield no results. I would like to ask members of the community to critique the work—perhaps by offering scientific arguments or logical counter-arguments based on their own astrological perspectives—regarding why they might find this scientifically measurable approach inconceivable. Alternatively, if they can envision it, what information do they feel is missing for them to fully grasp the model? Thank you, Diána